The 2016 presidential is shaping up to be one of the ugliest in recent history. After eight years of racial agitation under the Obama administration and social justice warriors run wild, race relations have reached a low point. We may even be witnessing the beginnings of a race war.

The evidence

At a recent Trump rally in San Jose California, a white woman was egged by a group of Hispanic men. The men waved the Mexican flag while screaming “fuck you!” in her face. The woman was merely exercising her right to attend a rally for the Republican presidential nominee.

In the video below, a white man is sucker punched by a man who is carrying a Mexican flag. Also, a white boy is chased by a crowd of non-white protestors because of his support of Trump.

Official approval of racial violence


The anti-Trump protestors are propagating the same message as Hillary. What a coincidence!

Recently, Hillary Clinton has changed her campaign approach. She has gone from emphasizing her supposed expertise and competence to using Trump’s German heritage to imply that he is a new Hitler.

Dilbert creator Scott Adams explains why Hillary’s new approach is so dangerous.

The only downside I can see to [Hillary’s] new approach is that it is likely to trigger a race war in the United States. And I would be a top-ten assassination target in that scenario because once you define Trump as Hitler, you also give citizens moral permission to kill him. And obviously it would be okay to kill anyone who actively supports a genocidal dictator, including anyone who wrote about his persuasion skills in positive terms. (I’m called an “apologist” on Twitter, or sometimes just Joseph Goebbels).

Why are they doing this?


Anti-white provocateur Jesse Benn is doing his part to encourage violence

The most obvious reason is that they are trying to get white Trump supporters to lash out at illegal immigrants or blacks. If that happens, the left will be able to paint Trump and his supporters as inherently violent. This would allow a weak, unattractive candidate like Clinton to paint herself as a hero battling the forces of violence, hate, and ignorance. In other words, it might make Hillary, the poster child for political corruption, appear good.

Another, darker possibility is that the left is trying to create a situation where nationalists are regarded as enemies of the state. This could open the door to legal action, and even military action, against nationalist groups. If Hillary were to get into power, she could use any violence committed by whites, even in self-defense, as an excuse to push draconian gun laws that all but repeal the Second Amendment.

But the left is playing a dangerous game. By trying to stop the rise of nationalism by encouraging racial hatred they are flirting with starting a cycle of violence that has not been seen in the US for decades.

What will the battle lines be?



The narrative that is being peddled is that there are two divisions of humanity: white people and “People of Color (POC).” White people are responsible for all the bad things in the world: racism, slavery, colonialism, wars, the Crusades, transgender discrimination, and income inequality. People of Color have been the victims of white aggression. The only way to correct this unjust situation is for the white people to cede power to the POC and gradually cease to exist.

This narrative is ridiculous, but it does have currency in a world where people get degrees in gender studies and are willing to pay to go to a nightclub where Kim Kardashian is making an appearance. In reality, there is nothing that unites all People of Color. An educated Indian has more in common with an educated white person than he does with an uneducated illegal immigrant.

For that reason, we won’t see a stand-off between whites and POC even though the left would love to see that. Rather, the coming racial violence will likely break along the same lines that we are witnessing at the anti-Trump protests—groups of illegal immigrants with smaller numbers of leftist blacks and whites versus whites who are perceived to support Trump.

In some cases, law enforcement has already shown an unwillingness to deal with anti-Trump protestors out of concerns for political correctness. If the police are unwilling to protect law abiding citizens, those citizens will begin to take their self-defense into their own hands. That would kick off a spiral of violence that could easily develop into a race war.

Why would anyone want a race war?


It is hard to understand why anyone would want an outbreak of racial violence. To do so, one must understand that our elites are unencumbered by any hint of Christian morality. Their only goals are to amass more money and power. All of the policies they support are aimed at achieving these goals.

The elites are globalists. While they may live in the US, they don’t necessarily feel an attachment to this country or any other. Their monetary interests benefit from the free flow of capital and labor throughout the world. National borders are a hindrance. Therefore, the elites probably do not want a race war per se, but they would be more than willing to use it as a mechanism to prevent a healthy nationalism coming to power in the US.

Elites will not suffer from a race war

Screen Shot 2016-06-07 at 8.04.58 PM

The people responsible for instituting the policies that will lead us to a race war will not suffer once it begins. These individuals live in wealthy, homogenous neighborhoods with excellent security systems in their homes. They never take public transportation, and if they are important enough, they have chauffeurs who drive them to work. Their children almost always attend private schools. They will watch everything unfold on television from the safety of their own homes. Thus, they have little to lose and a lot to gain by setting off the power keg of racial animus.


If you are familiar with my other articles you know that I tend to be contrarian when it comes to the narratives being pushed by our globalist elites. If they are trying to incite violence, the best thing to do is to avoid it. On the other hand, it would be wrong to give up our right of assembly due to leftist intimidation. The next several months, and possibly the next few years, promise to be interesting. The least that we can do is go into it with our eyes wide open.

If you like this article and are concerned about the future of the Western world, check out Roosh's book Free Speech Isn't Free. It gives an inside look to how the globalist establishment is attempting to marginalize masculine men with a leftist agenda that promotes censorship, feminism, and sterility. It also shares key knowledge and tools that you can use to defend yourself against social justice attacks. Click here to learn more about the book. Your support will help maintain our operation.

Read More: Beware Of The Coming Surveillance State