• Home
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Archives
  • Submit Article
  • Donate
  • Contact Us

Grimag

  • Popular
  • New? Start Here
  • Culture
  • Masculinity
  • Topics
    • Body
    • Game
    • Girls
    • History
    • Lifestyle
    • Mind
    • News
    • Politics
    • Religion
    • The Sexes
    • Travel
    • Wisdom
    • Work & Money
  • Submit
Home This Month Popular Either Everyone Can Use The N-Word Or No One Can

Either Everyone Can Use The N-Word Or No One Can

my-nigga
David G. Brown

David is a lifelong dissident and intellectual rebel. He despises political correctness, which replaces real, needy victims with narcissistic leftists out for a free meal. Though still a young man, he has watched society descend into its present morass with great sadness, combined with a determination to help make things better. He tweets when there's something worth tweeting here.

May 11, 2016 Politics
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Forgetting black airport workers and travelers, what’s the first thing an Australian like me often hears an African-American saying on the street after arriving in the US? Nigga, nigga, and nigga. Again and again, this word accosts my ears. From New York City to LA, Chicago to Seattle, it does not matter, unless you’re a white guy saying it. Because of this very strange, asymmetrical phenomenon, I put the following to you: either everyone should be able to use the word “nigga” and its ancestor “nigger,” or no one should.

If a white person, even a non-American, says either “nigger” or, more commonly, “nigga” in the presence of a so-called “brother,” their subsequent dental bill will be conservatively estimated at above $10,000. Yet for blacks it is the perennial term of endearment or rebuke, used in situations as disparate as casual greetings to bickering over a particular loose woman two parties want. How can a word be racist when a white says it, but acceptable when a black does?

The problem is really one of self-serving leftists selectively condoning different users of what is essentially one word, not two, depending on the skin color of the user. Why are liberals and SJWs especially so insistent on eliminating the word “nigger” from all parlance, all while turning a completely blind eye to African-Americans uttering “nigga”? After all, American elocution across every race and location is not only diverse in its types but greatly slackening overall. Lax, casual pronunciation invariably results in “nigger” sounding either identical or very close to “nigga.” Furthermore, a quasi-suffix change, lazy word endings or not, should not mean the difference between perpetuating racism and promoting a “beneficial,” expressive form of ebonics between African-Americans.

What SJWs really want is two separate but related forms of linguistic victimhood for African-Americans. On the one hand, whites using the term “nigger” or non-racistly appropriating “nigga” is the modern reinvention of slavery and Jim Crow era styles of oppression. Or so leftists say. Then we have blacks referring to one another as a “nigga.” The substitution of “-a” for “-er” is meant to make the word not just palatable but acceptable. Having been derived from “nigger,” though, the word is a subtle instrument for making African-Americans feel like victims amongst their own communities, with just the slightest phonetic difference between the two varieties. This reinforced victimhood is vital for left-of-center elites.

Democrats and SJWs need an almost universally pro-leftist and “victimized” black community, hence why “nigga” is tolerated and even promoted

Bill could count on the black vote and Hillary will. But what have they actually produced, aside from racial conspiracy theories that serve to keep African-Americans feeling victimized?

People often remark that evangelicals are the backbone of the Republican Party. What few remember, nonetheless, is that *only* 79% of them voted for Mitt Romney in the 2012. Comparable figures can be retrieved for both Bush elections and John McCain’s failed Presidential bid. Still, when this is compared to the proportion of blacks voting for Democratic Presidential (or Congressional) candidates, it fizzles into mediocrity. Some 93% of blacks voted for Obama in 2012. It did not matter that Obama himself was black; Clinton, Gore and Kerry all routed Republicans in attaining black votes. Unless you discount the liberal vs. conservative and Democratic vs. Republican categories, which are essentially meaningless in explaining voting preferences, no major demographic group votes anywhere close to as reliably for one party as blacks do for the Democrats.

This loyal base of support, which proves the difference in election after election won by Democrats, depends on reminding blacks of the past and, unfairly, associating that past directly with modern Republicans and just generally non-Democrats and non-SJWs. The GOP may have presided over the elimination of slavery in the 1860s, but the once vehemently pro-slavery Democrats are falsely equated with fighting contemporary racism.

This is where “nigga” comes in. Whenever it is used by African-Americans, it is seen as “reclaiming” the word. But to use “nigga” implies that the word “nigger” is in overuse today, which is patently not the case. The reality does not matter. What does is the bonafide scaremongering, namely that racism apparently lurks behind every corner featuring a white.

If this false climate of persecution were lacking or faded into non-existence, Democrats would have nothing to lure in black voters. They have delivered nothing of value for African-American communities. Incarceration rates for African-American young men actually increased due to Clinton era policies of sentencing, even as Democrats claimed that racism, not personal choice, explained the superlative rates of blacks being jailed for violent crimes.

To hide these failures, which extend to areas as wide as social welfare dependency and representation within the corporate and professional worlds, leftists need to use cheap devices like fixations on when whites rarely use the N-word or cops shooting black men either armed or reaching for their gun.

Beat up on everyone who says the N-word or let them all say it without consequence

People who use the word “nigga” in empowering ways. Not pictured: the white guy they kicked the shit out for saying “nigga” without even using “nigger.”

I do not support violence but using the N-word in either of its forms would be semi-understandable… if everyone faced the same penalties for mouthing it out. Until such time as there is equivalency in social and even physical rebukes, no black person should be able to reserve an exclusive right of use compared to whites and others.

Reaction to the word “nigger,” when blacks use basically the same term but with an “-a” themselves, also underscores the lack of legitimate gripes race baiters like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson have. They have to use poster boys for alleged police violence like Michael Brown, who was unequivocally proven to have assaulted Officer Darren Wilson and definitely tried to take his gun. Failing that, they can rail against a word whose derivative is the most commonly used noun of a massive proportion of African-Americans

For once in debates like this one, can we please inject some common sense? Alas, again probably, that’s asking for far too much.

Read More: The Word “Heroic” Has Very Little Meaning In Modern Times

May 11, 2016David G. Brown

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
What To Do When You've Been Rejected So Many Times That You're Ready To Give UpHow Advertising Shows The Decline Of American Culture


David G. Brown

David is a lifelong dissident and intellectual rebel. He despises political correctness, which replaces real, needy victims with narcissistic leftists out for a free meal. Though still a young man, he has watched society descend into its present morass with great sadness, combined with a determination to help make things better. He tweets when there's something worth tweeting here.

May 11, 2016 Politics
Top 5 Most Popular Posts
Roosh’s New Book
Roosh's new book, Free Speech Isn't Free, has just been released, and comes with two bonuses if you order now. It gives an inside look to how the globalist establishment is attempting to marginalize masculine men with an agenda that promotes censorship and sterility. It also shares key knowledge and tools that you can use to defend yourself against leftist attacks.

Click here to learn more about the book. Your support helps fund ROK's operation.
Tip Jar
Do you enjoy the content on ROK? If so, please consider making a donation. Click here to learn more.
Visit Kings Wiki—A Wikipedia For Us
Kings Wiki is an ROK-affiliated wiki that contains articles around the themes of masculinity and nationalism. Create your own article or click here to browse through the ones already created.
Recent Posts
  • ROK Undercover: What It Was Like To Attend A Muslim Service

    ROK Undercover: What It Was Like To Attend A Muslim Service

    Get ready for a lot of rituals
  • 4 Types Of Men Within The Masculinity Matrix

    4 Types Of Men Within The Masculinity Matrix

    The masculinity matrix also shows how you can move from …
  • Chris Brown Gets Arrested After Accusation By Unvetted Woman He Allowed In His Home

    Chris Brown Gets Arrested After Accusation By Unvetted Woman He Allowed In His Home

    In addition to her previous lies for personal gain, she's …
  • The Truth About Six Pack Abs

    The Truth About Six Pack Abs

    You don’t actually need to exercise 24/7
  • Kratom To Be Banned In The United States

    Kratom To Be Banned In The United States

    Make no mistake, drug company lobbyists use your elected politicians …
  • If SJWs Were Comic Book Characters

    If SJWs Were Comic Book Characters

    The comic book heroes cultural Marxists would like to see.
  • An Inside Look Into The Life Of Mike Tyson

    An Inside Look Into The Life Of Mike Tyson

    Is he the bad guy that many think he is?
  • How I Made A Feminist Call Me Daddy

    How I Made A Feminist Call Me Daddy

    Their social conditioning hasn't erased their primal needs.
  • Why You Should Definitely Approach Hot Girls Wearing Headphones

    Why You Should Definitely Approach Hot Girls Wearing Headphones

    Girls are not wearing headphones to deter guys, they're wearing …
  • 5 Things I’ve Learned From My First Year Abroad

    5 Things I’ve Learned From My First Year Abroad

    Am I homesick? Hell no.
RSS Newest Articles From Roosh
  • 24 Answers To Patriarchy & Tradition Questions
  • The Wisdom Books Of The Old Testament
  • I Was Reported In A Bar For Political “Harassment”
  • 19 Answers To Globalism & Politics Questions
  • My Interview With Pat Campbell On Talk Radio 1170
  • The Elites Are Not Smarter Than You
RSS Latest Forum Threads
  • Throw out your metal bristle BBQ cleaning brushes
  • Awful convo skills and needy friends . College Game Uk
  • ROK Undercover: What It Was Like To Attend A Muslim Service
  • Using the Science of Social Engineering to Succesfully Meet Girls in Bars
  • SJW Annaliese Nielsen insults a Lyft driver and gets him fired over a Hawaiian doll
  • Faces of male soldiers before, during, and after war - from female photographer
  • PSA: Tinder Social is outing you to your facebook friends
© Kings Media 2012-2016 • About • Advertise • Submissions • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms Of Service
Politics David G. Brown