Masculinity shame

March 7th, 2013

62

The Rise Of “Straight Shaming”

By

We spend a lot of time on this part of the internet hating on abrasive feminists. I’m not saying that the likes of Lindy West and Jessica Valenti haven’t earned our general ill-will, but I’ve begun to think that they really are not the worst of the enemies men face in this society today. The most militant opponent of the red-pill man is, in fact, the mangina.

I’m not the first to say that, nor am I about to be the first to discuss the particular mangina on whose words this post will focus. He’s been talked about in the manosphere before, and for good reason. The man I speak of is none other than Hugo Schwyzer:

390e790dd671ebf14bf586d475ef6c78

Schwyzer has already gone on record endorsing cuckolding and other ridiculous notions, so I’ve truly come to expect madness from him. What came about this week, however, surprised even me.

Today, gentlemen, Hugo Schwyzer would like you to consider taking it up the rear for gender equality:

Want to make straight men better in bed — and better feminist allies? The path may be simple: fuck them up the ass. According to one brand new book, the path to making men more compassionate, appreciative and playful may be straight through their butts.

In The Ultimate Guide to Prostate Pleasure: Erotic Exploration for Men and Their Partners, Charlie Glickman and Aislinn Emirzian make the case that straight “men who get into anal penetration are among the most secure in their masculinity: because they’ve examined themselves, faced their fears.”

No, he’s not done yet:

In a deeply misogynistic culture, there are few greater fears with which men are raised than the fear of being labeled as someone who acts like a woman, allowing himself to be penetrated…In his Myth of the Modern Homosexual, historian and cultural theorist Rictor Norton explains that the term “asshole” developed as a homophobic (and thus woman-hating) slur…

…Glickman and Emirzian acknowledge that this myth is persistent: “The idea that penetration is an act of dominance is almost certainly tied in to sexism and the notion that the woman’s role is inferior. Plenty of men have absorbed these ideas at a subconscious level. Even if a man doesn’t think it is an act of dominance when he penetrates his (male or female) partner, he may still hesitate to switch roles because he is afraid that it will mean losing his masculinity if he takes a turn catching instead of pitching.”

At this point you may be struggling to continue absorbing this insanity, but let’s finish this off:

The payoff for clearing those hurdles, Glickman says, is nothing less than the radical transformation of heterosexual sex. In 2011, Glickman wrote a column entitled “How Pegging Can Save the World,” arguing that no other erotic experience a man can undergo can create greater empathy with women than being penetrated by his partner…the sooner men get over their anxiety and guilt, the more fun they and their partners will have. And maybe, just maybe, we can peg our way right out of sexism itself.

Alright, we’ve made it.

Contained within this absurd narrative is a clear insight into what could be considered a larger agenda of emasculation, and that agenda involves what I like to call straight shaming. Consider the following implications of this piece.

It is not enough now to merely be a heterosexual and tolerate those who have different orientations. Now, to truly combat misogyny in the eyes of folks like Schwyzer, one must be fully open to participating in homosexual acts.

tumblr_mhoxnkNVvn1s53idro1_1280

If you are a heterosexual male uncomfortable with the idea of partaking in a homosexual act, you are…

a) promoting the perpetuation of a misogynistic culture
b) showing that you’re not comfortable in your own sexuality
c) promoting homophobia (which is now, apparently, also analogous to woman-hate)

Going by this logic, any male who is not open to participating in a homosexual act is now presumed to be insecure and, therefore, deemed secretly gay or bi.

Males who are open to those acts are deemed tolerant and worthy combatants against sexism and misogyny. Their open performance of these acts also essentially renders them gay or bi, just like their less “open” peers.

Meanwhile, the actual homosexuals (gay and bi men) are still as they always were.

Where does this logic leave us, then?

EVERY MAN IS GAY OR BI.

blog_100910glee_rollingstone

The goal is not just to promote the tolerance of homosexuality, but to promote the dominance of homosexuality. That is, to make homosexuality and openness to engaging in it the only acceptable way forward for any given man.

It is imperative that any heterosexual male concerned with self-improvement be aware of this phenomenon. There’s nothing wrong with homosexuality—I don’t believe it is a choice and I think we should recognize the right of those who are so inclined to live as they will.

That being said, there is also nothing wrong with being an unabashedly heterosexual male. You can rest assured that given the choice between that model of masculinity and the emasculated variant advocated here by Schwyzer, women will largely spring for the former, claims of their “anti-sexism” and opposition to “gender stereotypes” be damned.

Don’t believe me? Take a look at our media. Do the ideal examples of masculinity in the media that women above the age of consent spend enormous amounts of time fantasizing about and swooning over resemble effete men with a penchant for getting it up the butt?

Or do they look like these guys?

tumblr_mimoyiH0qj1qaphd5o1_500

tumblr_melkgncnWm1r3k60go3_500

tumblr_lrdbfcMO6K1r2lp2eo1_1280

tumblr_mj0p8sadOS1r94snro1_500

The answer should make things very clear.

Women do desire actual men, and no male should apologize for satisfying that demand.

Read Next: The Physical Decline of Modern Man



About the Author

is a young man whose background gives him unique insight on sociological and cultural changes that are happening today. His column runs every Monday.

«
»

Get More Dates With Our Free Text Messaging Guide

  • Arrange dates with our easy copy/paste method
  • 9 page free PDF download
  • Get twice monthly updates for our best content and advice
  • Enter your first name and email below

100% privacy. No Spam.


  • Dutchie

    You think a bunch of homos talking in the media will actually convince hetros to turn homo? Nah. Nope. Not going to happen. Ever. Except… if a hetro decides to take this man’s advice and take it up the butt, he was never truly hetro in the first place (media term: “Bi-curious”). But either way, who honestly cares? If 90% of guys decide to become gay, that won’t be a disservice to me; at all. Same with 90% of guys getting fat, or bald, or etc… All good for me.

    • Frost

      Go back in history twenty years at a time and you’ll always find a conservative movement that feels exactly as you do about whatever “radical” ideas the left is talking about at any given time.

      • lelio

        instance, briefly; come, instance

    • http://twitter.com/stompthewaffle Ethan Chittenden

      Considering that most gay men are ultra-promiscuous with a propensity towards pedo behavior, this wouldn’t be good for anyone. Won’t somebody please think of the children?

  • Professor Ashur

    Srsly?

    Well, I would like to submit a reframe on this:

    I consider the act of a dick entering a woman’s vagina to be symbolic of her completely swallowing up his manhood, he is no longer seen by anyone else, suffocating him from every direction, and being the sole recipient of what he ‘produces’, so to speak.

    Therefore, all sexual penetration is matriarchal. It represents the complete ownership of the male.

    Keep your Kegels off my freedom!

    May I get some histrionic shrieks of agreement from the guys, please?

    • Norok

      Wow… this is remarkably original and I have never heard it stated as such. It doesn’t matter if you’re serious or not… it makes a great way to counter troll feminists for their “penis oppression symbolism” analogies.

      I’m going to use this…

    • Frost

      This was the Greek view of sex. Penetration was manly, being penetrated was feminine. Not sure how I feel about the implication that banging dudes in the ass is totally cool but there you go.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Micheal-James/100003510885971 Micheal James

    You know what would be funny, if 90% of males become homosexual, then all the females would be so pissed of at the lack of straight males because they only had 10% of the population to choose from. Then women might actually become more feminine. and normal.

    • Priaperos

      Well Michael…it’s likely that it’s only 10% of the world’s males who are pounding the poonani-pavement of 90% of the women in the world anyway. I don’t know if it’s helping with their femininity or not.

    • anonymous

      Nope, we already have proof — if the percentage of straight men in a given location drops dramatically, the women will still fixate on the most alpha and fight / Manjaw over those alphas. Instead of becoming more feminine, they will become nearly masculine in their territorial aggression:

      http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/02/11/is-college-a-poon-nirvana/

  • http://www.returnofkings.com/author/cofatrok Edward Thatch

    I hope every man in the world except me does become gay. That would be awesome.

    “Stand in line, ladies. I can only handle three at a time.”

    And think of all the bistros and gentrification we’d see. The whole world would be like MidTown Atlanta.

    • CQ

      A whole world I’d never see again

  • Vinicius

    Consider Morrissey, who recently said that if there were more gay men, there would be less wars, and that armies and nuclear weapons are essentially heterossexual practices… I’m glad I live in our times, because in the future being a straight man will be considered against the law.

    • Ian Ironwood

      I’d hardly consider Morrissey a serious voice of masculine reason.

    • Nik

      I was thinking the same thing. In many social circles it’s very ‘cool’ to be gay by straight folks. Whereas if the same man was straight the chicks in the same social circle would consider him the typical run of the mill asshole. Come to think of it I seem to recall once reading where some straight guys go to places and bars and tell chicks they are gay, only to find the women wanting to try to make them try heterosexual sex. The social dating scene is the USA is a fucking circus these days.

    • Eric_D_Read

      I guess Morrissey must not be too familiar with the history of Ancient Greece or Rome.
      …or modern Pashtun culture (same as the ancient one except with guns) for that .

  • taterearl

    And then the women would complain along with the fact there are no more good men that there are no more straight men.

  • Frost

    Excellent article. I have nothing against homosexuals on a personal level, but the vigor and enthusiasm with which the Left embraces the gay activist movement makes me wary of it and keeps me on the lookout for trends like this.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Carson-Daves/100003247228938 Carson Daves

    Nice article, but I must say I fully support the idea of male feminists getting fucked in the ass.

  • Mr. Mitchell

    Hugo is the Uncle Tom of the feminist movement.

    • maciano

      more like uncle bottom

  • Roosh_V

    “Where are all the good men?”

    Getting fucked in the ass, like you encouraged them to.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Carson-Daves/100003247228938 Carson Daves

      “Where are all the good men?”

      Failing shit tests LOL

      Literally LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLZZZZ

  • Therapsid

    Notice how dancing in clubs shifted from face to face, which it was back in the day, to guys grinding their asses on chicks. All the girl needs to do is slap on a strap on and he’s right there with Hugo.

  • John

    Pretty soon their gonna decide it’s a “choice” after all. And there’s only ever one right choice with these people.

  • Sombro

    Schwyzer’s insistence that other men should engage in behavior they have no interest in shows he is the one who is insecure.

  • Ian Ironwood

    The thing that irritates me about the GrandMangina’s drivel is that it’s a blatant ploy to attempt to get gay men and straight men hating each other . . . when we should both be hating Hugo for what he’s doing to the name of masculinity.

    It doesn’t matter if you like your prostate tickled, or by what or whom. That’s like saying “all lesbians would convert back to dick if they just slept with a REAL man”, and it’s patently misandrous and grossly false. What matters is that whatever your masculine sexuality is, you embrace it and practice it, even if it means taking it up the butt.

    Or staring at really big boobs.
    Or watching porn in your spare time.
    Or learning Game in an effort to improve your count.
    Or only approaching chicks wearing skirts.
    Or summarily snubbing every feminist who expresses an interest in you.

    Feminism has attempted to use male sexuality — both gay and straight — as a crowbar to keep men in general from uniting under our common issues and interests. Gay men enjoy the same visitation, custody, and alimony issues that straight men do. Gay men register for selective service, just like straight men. Gay men have to put up with rooms full of catty beyatches talking about their exciting lunch plans and asking their opinions about all sorts of inane shit when they’d just rather be surfing the web for gay porn. When it comes down to it, all men — gay and straight — would rather watch people have sex than listen to yet another discussion on the advantages of lap band surgery.

    Hugo makes the mistake of thinking that homosexuality is still a big enough issue to make us all run from the room, sphincters clinched. But this is the 21st century. We sell a lot of butt plugs and anal vibes to straight men over in the pornworld. Even conservative straight men. Having your prostate gland stimulated does not release a stream of liberal and progressive hormones into your system, sorry. it doesn’t even make you sympathize with women (although if you feel you must . . . ). It just gets you off.

    Now, having your wife strap on a dildo and sexually dominate you might terrorize you into being more “sympathetic”, which seems the direction in which Hugo wants you to go . . . but just because one of our sex organs is up our butt doesn’t mean that its stimulation will make us more feminine.

    Hell, the most masculine dude I know loves it up the butt. And no, he’s not particularly sympathetic to women.

    • monitor

      Troll troll troll troll

      • seedless

        guess again. do some reading

  • 2mques

    My grand dad taught me a lesson once that I’ll never forget; “Never trust a man who looks like he has never been punched, because blows to the face and the chest teaches you how to think before you open your big, dumb mouth.”

    • Psychonaut

      Your grandpa is fuckin’right

  • Mad Max

    Men out there, flag this blog because it is going to become visionary in the near future. “Pegging” is going to become the new “I’ll do you if you do me” which oral sex used to be. I have heard some anecdotal evidence of this already from friends. The story was always the same. They found some hipster chick at the bar, gamed them, went to the woman’s place, and before she would allow vaginal penetration she would want to penetrate the man’s anus with a dildo or another object. Before reading this blog I had always dismissed it as some crazy chick phenomenon. But, if it has hit the fringe media it is going to head mainstream quickly. Soon it will bleed into your standard feminist dogma and will be adopted by all of its foot soldiers. Women will start beleving en masse that they need this type of “buy in” from a man before engaging in normal, heterosexual relations with him.

    The agressive promotion of the homosexual agenda is all about the end game – CONTROL. Effeminiate men do not question authority just as women are less inclined to question shows of authority. Also, women are the herd gender whereas men, masculine men, are the individuals. Want women to do something en masse? Tinker with some facets of popular culture and get the right Alpha women to start a trend and poof you have women wearing and consuming the newest latest fashion. It does not work that way with men, but the power hungry elite sure would like to have it that way.

    Every time you see something pop up like this always view it through the lens of the elite or the government wanting to gain more control over you. Do it every time.

    Why do they want your guns? Control.

    Why do they want to run the health care system? Control.

    Why do they want men to act like women? Control.

    Why do they want drones in the sky? Control.

    Why do they want you to not be able to speak your mind? Control.

    Why do they want you to only be able to go to public school? Control.

    Why do they want to keep fighting a failed war on drugs? Control.

    It is about control each and every time. No true power broker actually believes in equality, helping the needy, reducing violence, or any of that crap. They only believe in control or independence. That is it. The war is between those who wish to control or be controlled against those who wish to be independent and not controlled.

    • http://acehaley92.wordpress.com/ Ace Haley

      Thread winner

    • roland

      QUOTE MAD MAX: “They found some hipster chick at the bar, gamed them, went to the woman’s place, and before she would allow vaginal penetration she would want to penetrate the man’s anus with a dildo or another object. Before reading this blog I had always dismissed it as some crazy chick phenomenon. But, if it has hit the fringe media it is going to head mainstream quickly. Soon it will bleed into your standard feminist dogma and will be adopted by all of its foot soldiers. Women will start beleving en masse that they need this type of “buy in” from a man before engaging in normal, heterosexual relations with him.”

      Amen.

      I have also never seen a more fagged-out generation of men like today’s hipsters. Think of the band Foster The People.

      • Eric_D_Read

        “I have also never seen a more fagged-out generation of men like today’s hipsters. Think of the band Foster The People”

        It looks like that’s the preferred form of peacocking among that crowd. The scary part is that their parents are rich and connected as fuck and indulge their every whim.

    • Disco Alpha

      Who said you can’t find wisdom in the comment section of a blog. Some mod should flag this for the top.

    • CMLiu

      Why is it that every crazy male feminist I see turns out to be a white guy?

  • http://www.facebook.com/adrian.forte Adrian Forte

    There’s an even broader issue at work here too. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Maybe a man likes it up the ass, maybe he doesn’t. But either way, it’s just going to be how he feels about a particular sensation. A guy may love getting pegged by his wife, but it isn’t likely to make him more emotionally deep and in tune with feminine agendas.

    Maybe a woman likes wearing a strap-on. Does that mean she’s suddenly more likely to empathize with being a man? No. Because this is stuff people do in bed, for fun, to get off. Why must every god damn sex act be somehow symbolically tied to some great deeper social, political, or emotional meaning? We all do stuff in bed that gets us off. Maybe it means something, maybe it’s an insight into someone’s psychology. Or maybe it’s just fun. And either way, what’s true for how and why one person might like something doesn’t mean those psychological reasons are true for anyone else.

    Mark Twain said it best: Persons attempting to find a motive in this narrative will be
    prosecuted; persons attempting to find a moral in it will be banished;
    persons attempting to find a plot in it will be shot.

    Sometimes, a sex act just comes down to a matter of liking something, or not. Period. End of story. Full stop.

    • J.M.

      Troll, troll and ignorant troll.

      • http://www.facebook.com/adrian.forte Adrian Forte

        Yeah, because it’s really trolling to say that what gets you off doesn’t have to be a sociopolitical act filled with deep symbolism.

  • Dr. Zoidberg

    So can I still get the ol’ Shanghai pinky finger massage when she’s going down on me without becoming a feminist?

  • citizen norbit

    haha feminists have such a pathological hatred of masculinity, it makes perfect sense they’d demand men get rammed up the ass before they can be “good allies”. It’s just an indication of how castrated are male feminists that this can be said out loud.

    Also, these loons have a massive obsession with rape, and when you think about it that’s all this boils down to, trying to force men to assume the position of a violated man. It’s just further proof that feminism is a particularly unfortunate mental disorder.

  • http://locepedia.net/ Loc

    So men are better than women at feminism. Anybody even surprised by this?

  • http://acehaley92.wordpress.com/ Ace Haley

    Manginas are a waste of sperm

  • ScorpioMan

    ‘ There’s nothing wrong with homosexuality…’

    Yes, there is. If you honestly believe this, you have already sold out your man card.

  • Sid

    It’s really guys like this one Schwyzer who really turned me against the pro-gay movement. 15 years ago, one was a liberal to think that gays should be left alone and not treated like shit. Now to hold view is to be a homophobe, because one must accept gay marriage, go to drag shows and even get a mushroom tip in the ass to prove one is not an oppressive homophobic pig.

    When you consider the efforts underway to stigmatize heterosexual males (98-99% of the male population), one wonders how bad homophobia really is. Homophobia might be cruel to 1% of the population, but it at least holds back a twisted worldview that makes being a heterosexual male a crime, thus making life significantly worse for 99% of the population. If you sympathize with Occupy’s logic (99% > 1%), then what does this say about the efforts to actively promote homosexuality and to shame men who find homosexuality to be disgusting?

    Granted, I don’t care about gays. Their lifestyle is of no importance to me, even though I find it disgusting and want nothing to do with it. I’ve had gay roommates and have let them be. It’s the mindset promoted by Schwyzer that I find repellent, and if I had to choose between homophobia or getting fucked in the ass, I would choose homophobia any day of the week.

  • Pantalones

    I don’t know about putting Chris Brown. I mean the guy wears skinny jeans, ok?
    Aside from beating down overrated Rihana, I don’t see nothing else alpha about this dude.
    I mean he wears skinny jeans. TIGHT skinny jeans.
    Also he’s known to throw girly tantrums. Enough said.

  • Martin F. Mayhem

    All you need to know about a fraud and hypocrite named Hugo Scwyzer:
    http://www.xojane.com/issues/hugo-schwyzer-controversy

    “But part of it is really just me being ignorant, full stop. Thus, I decided to do some reading about Hugo Schwyzer, about his troubling history as an addict and about why so many people would rather he simply vanish from feminist spaces entirely, if not from the face of the Earth.” … “[An] attempted murder-suicide that took place in 1998, while Schwyzer was under the influence of drugs.”

    Do read the whole .xojane blog post.

    Or this:
    http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterfliesandwheels/2011/12/people-can-be-so-ineffable/
    “Schwyzer claims to be a “male feminist” and to have focused his life on feminism out of remorse and to make amends for his past grotesque history of woman-hating and violence, including both having sex with his female students and attempting to murder his ex-girlfriend. This opportunistic motherfucker is full of shitte.”

    People for whom the free market and society in general doesn’t work are always trying to change the system to benefit themselves. Manginas have little to no shot at Brazilian super models (Mick Jagger and the Pats’ Tom Brady) thus social re-engineering is paramount to achieve what they want.

    Well done to Athlone McGinnis for explaining part of this on-going process.

  • Telemachus_1

    It would seem all of these characters are members of a particularly troublesome tribe.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1448949975 Mark Minter

    The internet publishing world is getting very complicated. The
    largest majority of what exists in the internet does so because of
    advertising. And it is becoming the tail that is wagging the dog.
    Content now is advertising or exists only at the behest of advertising.

    On
    one side you have publishers of content and on the other you have
    advertisers working at the behest of commercial entities, clients. In
    the Mad Men era, the creatives that produced the ads were the force as
    the ads were placed into mass media. The reception by people and
    persuasive content accomplished the goal of the ad were due to the work
    of the creatives.

    Today, it is the foot soldiers of that
    industry, those that actually get the ad in front of the eyes where it
    will have the most effect that controls the efficiency of the ads. In
    the initial days of internet advertising, until 2009, they used the
    print and television model of wholesale blocks to various publishers on
    the basis of what the typical person that might read the webpage was
    like.

    But with the advent of multiprocessing, commodization of
    servers, and algorithms to control complex statistical computation, the
    emergence of a technology called “Real Time Bidding” has now turned the
    tables in favor of advertising. A concept called the Demand Side
    Platform now keeps huge amounts of data about users internet activity
    and uses the data in something called a Naive Bayesian Classifier to
    classify users into one of hundreds of predictable groups all containing
    hundreds of variables.

    At the moment the page will be
    dynamically realized and presented to a user, this classification data
    is used in an auction on the Demand Side Platform and the worth of this
    set of eyes, this viewer that will now see the page, is then
    electronically bid on by advertisers. So by placing the ad in front of
    eyes that might achieve the goal of the ad, then efficiency of the ad
    is raised.

    The publisher, however, fears a loss of revenue, as
    potentially the “viewers” of his publication might be bid downward by
    the mechanism. Under the block strategy he had a predictable revenue,
    and he could adjust his viewership by adjusting the content offered.
    But given how the advertisers view the effectiveness of Real Time
    Bidding, it will only increase. Not only because it works but it also
    imports automation to a function that had required sales teams before.

    Now,
    the publishers fight back. And the way they fight back is with
    writers like Hugo Smegma. Hugo deliberately creates outrage, and is
    quite successful at it. Article after article, indicts men, shame men,
    vilify men, to the delight of female readers, and pisses the fuck out
    of men. One term I have found to describe this style of writing is
    “Link Bait”. So blogs like this one, ROK, rail over Hugo’s articles and
    post the link to the original.

    Then a huge and diverse number of
    internet users come flooding into the orginal post and it whomps that
    Demand Side Platform with user categories far far more diverse than the
    normal readership of the page and potentially massively drives up the
    revenue.

    Hugo works for publishers because the misandry inherent
    in society allows any publisher to bash the shit out of men and say “We
    don’t censor women’s issues”.

    Hugo Smegma is a genius at
    continuously finding ways to up the ante, going from Men Are Weak to
    now, this sheer genius of Outrage, that Men Should Get Fucked in the
    Ass. I can’t wait to see where he goes next. And we all react. He is
    the tail the wagging the dog and he is laughing all the way to the bank.
    He is probably literally being alpha by being beta and the fame and
    cash he makes has him sitting in hot tubs with a harem, joking with his
    bitches about “how we freaked the fuck out over getting fucked in the
    ass’. And all his bitches giggle and say “Hugo you’re so smart at how
    you make those stupid men jump your rope”.

    The issue of men and
    the Manosphere is that we are utter children in sophistication compared
    to where the women are at not only using this advertising strategy for
    ideological gain and profit, but actually being complicit partners in
    it. They create content at the behest of advertisers, attend meetings,
    and are part of the strategy. Nobody typically in the manosphere works
    in this industry. And almost none of us understand it. And I am sure
    of this comment is Greek to most of you.

    We have nothing like
    this. Our writers are earnest writers that often are not monetized.
    The most provocative writer we have is Roissy and he doesn’t even have
    ads. The only blog we have that is even close to Jezebel is Return of
    Kings and Jezebel is years ahead in sophistication in the reality of
    internet, culture, and the mechanics of the advertising system.

    We better wake the fuck up and learn how this game is being played and start bringing guns to gunfights.

  • Danny

    I am glad that feminists made this move. Now every man would start to understand how absurdly dumb these women are. Even women who like masculine men will now start to shy away from the mainstream feminism. I encourage the professional mangina who wrote this article to keep writing and informing everyone about the absurdity of the feminist movement. Soon everyone will realize that the only two reasons feminists want to continue are:

    1. They are not smart enough to add value to our society aka get a meaningful job or start a new business. Hence, they need feminism to put food on the table.

    2. They hate men with all their heart. Its not about “empowering” women. That has already been done.

  • Willis

    Guys in college don’t give a shit about doing gay stuff as long as their is at least one girl around. Dudes love mmf threesomes. It’s a bonding experience for them to relate on a primal level with their fellow man by high fiving one another and clasping hands while being balls deep in one girl.

    Anybody else remember when Eric northman had the sex wit de gay vampire? Twas awesome eh? *high five*

  • Ross

    Two words. Justin Bieber! :P

  • switch

    QUOTE: ” the sooner men get over their anxiety and guilt, the more fun they and their partners will have. And maybe, just maybe, we can peg our way right out of”

    What that means is that if shit continues to go this way and becomes a norm, then we can expect to see health classes throughout the public schools require young boys to be anally penetrated.

  • Serious

    QUOTE ATHLONE: “..going by this logic, any male who is not open to participating in a homosexual act is now presumed to be insecure and, therefore, deemed secretly gay or bi.”
    Or worse, if one is not into performing a gay act then he must be the next unabomber or a terrorist therefore he should be locked up in prison. It’s a pre-emptive strike. I could see this happening if things continue down the socialist dictatorship road.

  • http://www.facebook.com/john.loo.273 John Loo

    So, not partaking in a gay act makes me gay? Flawless logic.

  • http://www.facebook.com/john.loo.273 John Loo

    So there’s two sides to a coin, you toss it, you might get a penis or a vagina. Does it really matter what you get? Am I to believe women have no power at all? It’s not that kind of question at all. It’s a question of MORE POWER. That’s what every organization is about. People get in groups because there’s more strength in numbers. Hypocrites. God damn hypocrites.

  • Robert

    We could all fist Hugo to show him how much we care.

  • blah

    Lol. He’s not talking about homosexuality, since he’s talking about a WOMAN penetrating a man. That’s still a heterosexual act.

    Anyway, of the guys I supposedly spend enormous amounts of time fantasizing about, the only one I recognized was John Hamm (I think.. the second one). I don’t find him that attractive, nor any of the other guys.

  • roosevelt dunn

    This is just a gay man trying to use feminism to push his agenda, he is definitely not straight nor into women, deep down inside he is a bottom.

  • Master Dogen

    This cute lil hippie chick used to come into my bar with her willowy, wimpy boyfriend. One night, hippie chick and me got drunk after hours and I ended up taking her home for some fuckeration. I wasn’t even trying to be all tough-guy, but just my usually ‘grab a girl and do what you want’ self. Afterwards, she was insatiable. Wanted more, wouldn’t let me sleep, woke me up early for two more sessions, etc.

    Finally, both exhausted, she explained: Her and her “boy”friend had experimented with her fucking him in the ass with a dildo. He liked it so much that it was basically all they did now. She, as a hippy and “feminist”, felt she couldn’t reject this desire of his, which was so “enlightened.” But she was miserable. A cute, sexual, young girl, dying for a proper rogering… but denied this pleasure because her “man” was a limp poofter.

    So I rest my case: HUGO SCHWYZER HATES WOMEN AND WANTS THEM ALL TO BE MISERABLE AND SEXUALLY UNSATISFIED, FOREVER. The end :)

  • JustAMan

    Hi, I’ve been into this since I first saw it in porn as a teenager. I’m also into all sorts of other weird BDSM shit. I game girls just like everyone else here, and once I have them hooked, I start intoducing the weird stuff, some of them are really into it, most aren’t. So, I basically have to close ten girls for more than a few bangs in order to find one that actually gets off on the freaky weird shit and isn’t a total headcase, because with a girl ‘doing it cuz you want her to’ and ‘doing it cuz it turns her on’ are two different places.

    I am currently in a relationship with traditional gender roles (she cooks, cleans, takes care of me, acts feminine, etc), and yeah, we do all sorts of things that would probably really bother people if they knew. I get off on it, if you don’t, well, whatever, that’s you.

    That said, if mainstream girls start using pegging in shit tests, I’m not going to suddenly turn into a pussy, fail shit tests, and go home crying. I’m going to get disgusted with the weird girl who is bringing it up and go hit on someone else.

Back to Top ↑