3 Reasons That Suggest Feminists Have Asperger’s Syndrome

I used to work with students on the autism spectrum, and after learning more than I probably should have about feminists and how they work, I’m convinced they’re largely women with Asperger’s Syndrome. Without going into full psychology-mode, let’s just say it’s a milder form of autism that disrupts a person’s life in three major ways:

1. Significant difficulties in social interaction

This is perhaps demonstrated best on the internet. They completely lack self-control, curse like sailors, use their keyboards to scream at everyone they disagree with, and only seem to be “on the same side” as other people who are doing the exact same thing.

Anyone who dares confront their bubble with facts, science, logic, or reason sends them into histrionic rage-fits. You have never seen, and will never see, an internet feminist type the words, “Hmm, I thought of it a different way, but in light of new evidence, perhaps I was wrong. Please tell me more.”

Instead, they stick to their idiotic beliefs, immune to logic and allergic to reality. They seem completely unable to hold adult conversations with anyone. And, at risk of driving more traffic to the site, I must mention David Futrelle’s site “manboobz.” Futrelle is the typical male feminist; an overweight, thinking-impaired omega male.

Manboobz, touted as a fantastic resource for feminists, is the cowardly fucktard Futrelle’s pride and joy. He is consistently disingenuous, lies about everything, does no homework, and chooses to make fun of the clothes people wear instead of discussing the points they make. He once published an article that got most of the facts wrong about the “Don’t Be That Girl” campaign in Edmonton. I rudely corrected him in the comments section, after which he updated his article to reflect the things I had to teach him, then banned me from the site.

Anyway, I mention the site because of the comments section. Nearly 100% of the comment threads on his “fantastic resource for feminists” website take two or three messages to completely unwind into his followers randomly updating the world about their cats. Sometimes, they talk about their houseplants instead.

It happens as a response to nearly every article, with random people spouting random irrelevant bullshit at each other. Somehow, this is called “a conversation” over there. I call it “a group of social retards who cannot understand how conversations work.” They almost never comment on the topic at hand—which is entirely made-up bullshit anyway—and just decide that everyone must live in their little fantasy world where everyone knows everyone else’s cats.

2. Cannot understand nonverbal communication

Nonverbal communication could, perhaps, use some explanation before I continue. There is an estimated ratio throughout psychological essays that human communication can be broken down into two parts:

• Verbal communication, which is the words you use. This is an estimated 7% of the entire message being communicated between two humans.
• Nonverbal and Paraverbal communication, which are things like vocal tone, body language, context, and emotional cues. This makes up the remaining 93% of the message(s) being communicated between human beings.

Nonverbal communication is generally a right-brained ordeal, which is to say, it uses the part of your mind that deals with ambiguities, vagueness, and context clues to draw conclusions. It is not as “left-brained” as logic or literal content.

For example, let’s take a look at the sentence, “We really shouldn’t be doing this.” Further, let’s say that a women says it to a man while the two of them are becoming intimate. Your left-brained verbal communication skills deliver the message to you literally: this is a bad idea. Hence, we should not be doing this. Your right-brained nonverbal communication skills, however, takes far more into account. How is she saying it? What is her body doing? What are the context clues available?

So, imagine that the two of them are hooking up. The woman, dragging her nails down the sides of the man’s body and kissing him intimately, begins to become aroused. She drops her voice to a “bedroom” tone, and delivers the sentence as “We reeeeallly shouldn’t be doooiiinnnng this…” with a sly smile on her face as she unbuttons the man’s pants.

A left-brained SpergBot, unable to infer the message from the body language, tonality and context clues, would interpret this rigidly as “We need to stop right now.” A neurotypical human being, who has access to all the brain’s many functions, would interpret this as “We’re about to hook up. She’s taking my pants off, taking the initiative towards sex, so she must just be saying that to add a little spicy ‘taboo’ to the interaction.”

I believe this “FemBots are SpergBots” theory perfectly explains why feminists seem so completely unable to understand the nuances of the human mating ritual.

Whatever she says is ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY WHAT IT MEANS and it does not matter what else is going on.

Consent needs to be VERBALIZED AND AGREED ON before intimacy can occur. Just because she’s spitting on her hand for lube and sucking your cock doesn’t mean she wants sex, according to such insanity.

Basically, FemBots need a contract written out for them before they can understand that sex is about to occur, with both parties verbally agreeing on every single step of the intimacy process, because their brains cannot comprehend the dance.

3. Restrictive and repetitive patterns of behavior and interests

Everything that a FemBot may not like—and I do mean everything that exists in the world—can be explained by the term “Patriarchy.”

• Wage gap? Patriarchy.
• Golden Uterus Complex? Patriarchy.
• Criminally corrupt justice system? Patriarchy.
• The fact that men are attracted to attractive women? Patriarchy.
• Video games? Patriarchy.
• Sandwiches? Patriarchy.
• Cold winter nights? Why, patriarchy, of course.

The insanely single-minded focus they use renders everything under that one lens. They are not open to other ideas about why things are the way they are. They can find patriarchy in literally anything, as the criminal Princess Anita Sarkeesian recently demonstrated with her idiotic campaign against video games.

And speaking of “restrictive patterns of behavior,” let’s take a look at the laughable SlutWalk campaign. For those of you who don’t know, SlutWalk has two purposes:

• To demonstrate the fact that FemBots can’t understand the connection between actions and consequences, and more importantly,
• It gives ugly, overweight, masculine women a chance to advertise that they’re easy lays, since that’s the only way any man might ever pay attention to them.

Basically, the mission of SlutWalk is to promote the idea that “We should be allowed to wear whatever we want, whenever we want, getting as drunk as we want, walking around as alone as we want down the darkest alleys we want, without ever having to worry about what might happen to us.”

Which is a pleasant fantasy, I suppose, expect when that darned reality rears its ugly head. Listen, honey—NOBODY has that right. Not even us dick-swinging patriarchs have the privilege of doing whatever the fuck we want whenever the fuck we want without fearing rational consequences. That’s just not how life works. Every time you leave the house, you are incurring the possibility of risk; you could get hit by a car, someone at your office might go berserk and shoot you, or you could be mugged.

Risk always exists, and demanding that it leave you alone is just idiotic and childish.

But anyway, back to the point. Why would ANYONE be so completely obsessed with dressing that way, night after night, despite demonstrable risk and rational arguments not to do so? Why must they insist on taking risky behavior, drinking to excess, and painting themselves as easy targets?

Because, doggone it, that’s what they want to do. And they’re going to do it over and over and over again, like someone with a “dangerous risky lifestyle” tic that goes off twice an hour on average.

And then, as many of you have noticed, they cannot seem to utter more than half a sentence before uttering the dreaded R-word. Everything is rape. Psychological rape. Birth rape. Date rape. Marital rape. Regretted sex rape. Car wash rape. Stare rape. They say it on cue every few words.

This is a feature of autism known as “echolalia,” whereby they hear something and then repeat it, on loop, ad infinitum. The R-word is dropped around the feminist echo chambers of the world like LSD at Burning Man, where they can’t escape the word, until they find themselves mindlessly repeating it.

So, am I saying that all feminists have Asperger Syndrome? How should I know? I’m not a psychologist.

What I am saying is that it makes a lot of sense to me, and explains a good deal of the kind of behavior they are known for. All I do here is provide you, my beautiful audience, with facts and observations. It is up to you to connect the dots and see if what I’m offering makes more sense to you than what you thought before you read it.

Read Next: Feminists Try To Debunk False Rape Culture With False Evidence