Culture now-19

January 8th, 2013

118

40 Pictures That Show The Decline Of American Women

By

If you take a time machine back to the 1960s, this is what you would find:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

In only thirty years we traded all that in, for this:

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.

39.

40.

Do you think men of the 1970′s realized at the time that they had the best American women? I doubt it.

Don’t Miss: The Decline Of American Women



About the Author

has been blogging for several years over at RooshV.com about travel and women. He has also authored books on how to get laid in the United States, South America, and Eastern Europe. He launched Return Of Kings in October of 2012 to serve the needs of masculine men.

«
»

Recommended For You:


Get More Dates With Our Free Text Messaging Guide

  • Arrange dates with our easy copy/paste method
  • 9 page free PDF download
  • Get twice monthly updates for our best content and advice
  • Enter your first name and email below

100% privacy. No Spam.


  • John Galt2

    As I scrolled down the old school girls, I smiled and felt a sense of warmth. Then my feelings suddenly turned to disgust and hate. I literally had to turn my head at the sight of those beasts.

    I’ve said this before on your other blog, but the only thing better with modern women is the trimmed bush. The ONLY thing.

    • J.M.

      Hey, I am a young man and the bush (not excessive obviously) is one of the most beautiful parts of a woman, a shame our younger counterparts feel the need to try to imitate little prepubescent girls with their shaven pussy policy.

      • James

        lol that sounded like shaming. Do you trust the land whales and dirty chicks from today to clean the residue of her last fling out of that hair?

  • Anna

    You’re joking right? You deliberately picked pretty women from the 60s-70s and vice versa for our times. I could do the same and you’ll find the exact opposite + another one on men. You’re an unattractive and cynical man. I bet all your frustrated 2-3 (on a beauty scale men who obviously can’t get decent girlfriends/relationships/one night stands) supporters will bash my entry haha.The other respectable lot will agree with me.

    • Unending Improvement (@UnendImprov)

      Saw this, tempted to agree: “You’re joking right? You deliberately picked pretty women from the 60s-70s and vice versa for our times. I could do the same and you’ll find the exact opposite + another one on men.”

      Then you launched into a tirade starting with this: “You’re an unattractive and cynical man.”

      So I tuned you out as another hater.

      • Nik

        That, plus one thing to consider: I fuckin gaurentee that in the 60′s one could not find any women that would have come close to the 21st Century tatooed, STD ridden sacks of pig vomit monstrosities we are staring at today. Good God! Even if one was to consult with the most creative production houses of horror movies from Hollywood they could not come up with grotesque creations that come close to what now walks among us in everyday life. Somebody please post that Archies video here before I go blind from trauma.

      • eheh

        Nik is absolutely correct, those picture from the 60′s and 70′s WERE the sluts, with the mini skirts and kaleidoscope pantyhose. This IS an apples to apples comparison. You’d have to look pretttttty hard to find a fat chick in a mini skirt from the 60′s.

    • http://realmikaelryan.blogspot.com Mikael

      While there are still attractive female options out there you have missed the point Anna. in the 60′s any group of girl on average looked like the above photos. Go in public today and attempt to not see one of the girls below. To find a group of girls attractive in the 2000′s who care about their physical well being and who don’t use duck face is about as easy to do as finding an un-corrupt politician.

      • Stuki Moi

        Few girls in the 60s, as now, matched those on display in Life Magazine :)

        Once you start relying on photos published in national mags, I honestly don’t think the standard has dropped much. Perhaps not all American, but the current crop of Victorias Secret girls can stand up to anyone, anytime, in the looks department. At least for their age.

        High school yearbook photos comparisons would possibly be a better comparison, but may overstate the beauty of today’s women by being taken just prior to their inevitable bloating period. College pics are problematic, since the female student pool was much less representative back then.

        Pics of diner waitresses or nurses would be by suggestion, but who knows where to find those.

    • Roosh

      Most of the old-school pictures are from a high school on a normal day. These young women are not models and it’s not photoshop. In other words, lose the weight and attitude.

      • Uncle Elmer

        I get a big thrill out of my Viet wife wearing underwear that reminds me of those wholesome bikini-clad gals of the 60s and 70s. And miniskirts around 1969-1970 were quite breathtaking. That trend was followed by the notorious “hot pants”, which were still displayed with a flair for freshness and innocence in comparison to today’s attempts at slutty provocation.

        The only downside for the 70s was the emergence of the “braless” look and the ever-popular “halter tops”, which was quite intriguing for us young fellows at the time but the effects of gravity had disastrous long-term consequences on young women’s perkiness.

        Also remember when I entered Army basic to get my head shaved the barber admonishing us about never having seen so many young men suffering from early baldness due to our lovely long locks of hair.

      • Blackacre

        I wouldn’t use the LIFE magazine photographs as a valid representation of American high school girls in the 1960s because they were taken of Beverly Hills High School students. The affluent will always be considerably thinner and more fashionable than the general populace. I’m sure pictures taken today would depict girls who look similar in terms of thinness and femininity albeit with a darker look due to the influx of Persian Jews in Beverly Hills.

        I might be nit-picking, however: I’m sure the contrast would still be stark if you had used pictures of students in more working-class neighborhoods.

      • Paki Girl Pakeeza

        “The only downside for the 70s was the emergence of the “braless” look and the ever-popular “halter tops”, which was quite intriguing for us young fellows at the time but the effects of gravity had disastrous long-term consequences on young women’s perkiness.”

        Actually Uncle Elmer its the push up and underwire bras of today that result in more sagginess of the breast. Research it.

      • Paki Girl Pakeeza

        “Also remember when I entered Army basic to get my head shaved the barber admonishing us about never having seen so many young men suffering from early baldness due to our lovely long locks of hair.”

        HUH?

      • Mark

        Good job Roosh…enjoyed it….sure hits home with what as happened to our society and women.

    • Hugh G. Rection

      Yeah, anyone who disagrees with you must be unattractive. Let’s have a look at you, where’s your picture?

    • Phinn

      Anna: “I disagree with your thesis, so you must be unattractive!”

      Jesus, women are so predictable.

    • Maciano

      I sort of thought the same thing, but, then I ask myself: did (morbid) obesity, freakization, tattoos, piercings, attention whoring, et al were anywhere near the levels of today? No. In the 60s/70s women did have worse teeth and I bet they smell better because of better colognes these days.

      But that’s just looks/appearance, feminism (or whatever in modern culture it is) also makes women want to want more from men; thus lots of men feel they’re on a threadmill. All that wouldn’t be so bad, if women would do the same and become more attractive to men too.

      Lots of the latter pics are unbangable, but #30 is my nightmare of a wife/gf. The sluttiness and emptiness is so over the top… why do this to yourself? (LoL @ 21)

      • Paki Girl Pakeeza

        “. In the 60s/70s women did have worse teeth and I bet they smell better because of better colognes these days. ”

        colognes and perfumes are nausea inducing. the best smell is a clean body. not hard to get if you shower at least twice per day, morning and night.

  • external

    One can argue: “yeah, but we can do the same pictorial showing the degeneration of modern American men.” And I would answer:

    1) Writers and commenters in the manosphere routinely criticize all facets of modern American men.
    2) American men are endlessly bashed in the mainstream, while women get a free pass, because even the most mildly unflattering assessment of women is “misogynist” and “sexist.”

    So your post is bringing balance.

  • taterearl

    @ Anna

    You are quite the profession shamer. Call a man unattractive and can’t get laid because he is criticizing women. You are woman #1345434424 to mention that in the sphere.

    Hope you enjoy the attention.

  • logicwontgetmelaid

    I took note of this way back when I would look at my parent’s year books and photos of before I was born. The contrast always struck me.

    @Anna: It would have him taken him forever to find modern, non-slut, attractive women being feminine in everyday scenarios. In fact, if you tried, google images might blow up from the strain.

  • taterearl

    I better start building my time machine…I now have incentive.

  • We Cannot Get Out

    The fortress is taken! It is over. The world of men will fall.

    • Apollo

      HOLD YOUR GROUND!

      Sons of the U.S., the West, and all the other kindred souls entrapped within feminist cesspools of denigration….

      MY BROTHERS!

      I see in your eyes, the same fear that would take the heart of me.

      A day may come, when the courage of men fails, when we forsake our manhood and break all bonds of fellowship.

      BUT IT IS NOT THIS DAY…

      Decades of woe, and shattered hopes, when the Age of Men comes crashing down.

      BUT IT IS NOT THIS DAY….

      THIS DAY WE FIGHT!!!

      By all that you hold dear on this good earth, I BID YOU STAND, Men of the West!

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXGUNvIFTQw

  • EverydayRolling

    34: Honestly, she’s like a little kitten with a terminal illness. I just want to do the kind thing and put her out of her misery.

    35.36.37: There’s just something inherantly *wrong* here. I wouldn’t fuck these girls with your dick.

    38: Almost had a winner, then saw the tattoos and pointless facial mutilation. Possible.

    • anon123

      re # 38

      that and shes a whale.

      but ya…even if these are just “average high school kids” who knows how many hundreds of pictures the photographers took before selecting the best ones. still plenty of hot girls around today, they just seem to be much more materialistic, fake, and have feminism to comfort them and alleviate guilt for it. certainly, the girls have gotten fatter, trashier, and lost that alluring sense of innocence that elmer fudd was alluding to, but that is also why its so easy for us to score with them.

    • anon123

      ps i’d bang freaky number 19

  • Quoc

    Whoa, the guy in #9 looks uncannily like Jake Gylenhaal.

    And the Asian girl in two of the LIFE photos would be considered a 6 in an Asian country.

    • Uncle Elmer

      I am guessing she is “Native American”. As a resident of the Southwest, I often see locals who could pass for Asians, and in SE Asia have often seen people who could pass for Native Americans.

  • VagisBitch

    The number of men swallowing the red pill must be increasing exponentially. Hogs like this cannot run free without any man of normal intelligence will notice it. Look at snooki and her duck faced friend with attitude. Fine, they are celebs but the young women imitates them !
    To be a western man is now like being in hell. No more, no less. There is going to be some kind of explosion soon. You already see the beginning of it, those damn mas shootings.
    All committed by men driven insane by the modern society, read, the women in it. Yes women, you are responsible for mass shootings, and you are going to be responsible for a helluva lot more.
    All to satisfy you little ego feminist power trip and insatiable lust for attention whoring. Way to go.

  • VagisBitch

    The 60ties girls looks like EE girls looks now. Hope EE will not be like America anytime soon.

  • Armenian

    HAHAHA! #33 is a picture of that whale I found on POF and posted on RVF.

  • VagisBitch

    In all fairness many of these girls are from the Online Hamster Thread.

  • Anonymous

    Did women back in the day have shaved heads..neck tattoos?

  • Red Pill

    30 years? Set the DeLorean for even -10 years and you’ll see it wasn’t half as bad in 2002 as it is now. In my view the internet and smartphones have turned it all to shit. Jesus, even in the 80′s and 90′s chicks were OK.

    Luckily bourbon is delicious so, like, whatever…

  • Mike

    Slow news day? Such a moronic post, and this isn’t from a ‘hater’, its from someone who has standards on what he reads.

    • Roosh

      Sorry I posted your girl (#38). I like ice cream too.

      • Mike

        Dude the post is empty. You took random pictures of attractive girls from another era and then compared them to pictures of ugly girls from our current time.

        What exactly are we supposed to take from this? I mean i literally have no idea what you are trying to say. There were attractive women in the 60′s who frolicked in the park and today there are fat whores who make funny faces in their pictures?

        You produce some awesome content, and I have no problem giving props for that. Crap like this is to get page hits.

    • Big Ern

      I actually think these posts singling out the decline of American women are some of the best. That topic is also one of my biggest grievances, so that helps..

      • Mike

        Ern,

        I agree. However this post does not do that.

        I could, in just as much time as it took Roosh, make a post saying the exact OPPOSITE, find a bunch of pictures of attractive women from today (SEC college campus anyone?) and then compare it to the nerds/outcasts from 30 years ago.

        Have standards guys. Don’t be afraid to tell the content providers they are being lazy and feeding you drivel. Demand high quality and you will get it. Or accept crap like this and waste 5 minutes of your day looking at pictures that tell no story.

      • Seedless

        Demand high quality? This is a free site dumbass. You should consider yourself lucky that Roosh and people like him are offering you any of their knowledge and insight at no cost to you.

    • Lars

      You’re a fuckin chode “Mike”

      • anon1

        chode is the stupidest term i’ve ever heard. it diminishes your point, rather than exemplifying mike’s stupidity in his comment

      • Paki Girl Pakeeza

        Hold on, chode is a swear word in Urdu. Americans are using it now? What do they think it means? More cultural misappropriation?

    • Phinn

      I have standards on what I read, too.

      So, where’s your blog, Mike?

  • GuessHandsOn

    Hey, what’s wrong with #29?

    Come on guys… 60s may have had more feminine women but we have more slutty women. After all, could you take 4 different girls to your room in one week in the 60s?

    • VagisBitch

      Personally I’m not interrested in “sluts”..I find them revolting. Esp the ones who thing they are pornstars in the bedroom, just totally turns me off.
      So would I prefer 1 real girl instead of 10 american slut pornstars wannabees ? Of course. Like asking me if I would prefer a gram of gold over a mountain of trash.

      • TheIdiot

        Hahahaha. I like your post VagisBitch. I’d prefer a gram of gold over a mountain of trash any day, but sadly I see nothing but trash here in America.

    • anon1

      i think what Roosh was getting at is the general quality and femininity of women was higher. obviously nowadays its great to have a sport fuck and all, but for that femininity, affection side, you have to either move to eastern europe or go back in time.

      Two things a man requires from women: sex and affection (a function of their feminine nature)

      modern girls got the sex part, but miss the affection part

      • VagisBitch

        Sex with modern girls are only easy if 1) you are in the social circle or 2) you learn game, ie you have transformed yourself into a sociopath (at least while dealing with women) in order to get laid. You cant be “yourself” anymore but need to be in the constant role of alpha or hipster or secret multimillionaire handyman or what the fuck ever. Yea, if you can do all that, sex is easy but you lose you fucking self over it and is mediocre pussy really worth all that ?
        I would prefer any day sweet girls that I met under normal and natural conditions. Would date perhaps 1 month before banging. So what ?
        That beats the hell out of turning yourself into a misogynistic sociopath who bangs 20 useless girls a yea.

  • Banter

    I agree with external. There is a definite imbalance in the mainstream media. Men are portrayed as idiots that are incapable of performing the simplest of tasks until the cliche strong and independent female stereotype appears on screen and shows him the way. The fact that this trend has been allowed to continue only validates their already inflated egos. And if anyone on here disagrees with RooshV then check the obesity rates for the 1960′s and 1970′s and compare them to today and then try to defend your position. The fact is society, women included, are fatter and they shouldn’t be made to feel good about it. Anyone who enables this crap is hurting the people by telling them that there is nothing wrong with things like obesity, diabetes, and low self esteem. In short, you haters and enablers are only encouraging these people to slowly kill themselves.

    • TheIdiot

      Portraying men as stupid fools who need women to save them while portraying women as powerful and independent is all part of the mainstream media’s sick feminist agenda.

  • doug
    • Speakeasy

      In fairness, Aretha is 70 years old. Even if she thin who would be looking at a 70 year old woman?

  • Big Ern

    Clearly the women here have gotten fatter. I would love to read some kind of exposition on why the hell they’ve become so unfriendly, too. I didn’t notice this until I moved to Europe and then moved back here. I’m not alone in this:

    “Perhaps the biggest difference between English and North American women is that English women just seem to laugh a lot more. Wherever I look in London, I see women throwing their heads back and roaring with laughter; it’s like some wonderful, Hogarthian pageant. In New York the women always looked uptight, their spirits as undernourished as their bodies.”

    http://www.standard.co.uk/news/its-hard-dating-american-women-6318739.html

    • VagisBitch

      And English girls are also terrible. IF you can call English girls friiendly you need to got to EE or Asia, I dont know what you will call those girls then lol.

      • anon1

        Amen. English girls are the worst. (more slaggy and jersey shore like the further north you go in the country)

        the south (richer areas) has some english rose type women (daughters of rich blokes looking for some bad boy type excitement) and some good foreign lasses (again eastern europe and to an extent other places)

        but by far and away our girls are much worse than your American girls.

        it’s like we got the ugly behaviour and uptightness without the easiness of sex. Unless you go north (and even then, post sex, half their face/appeal is on the pillows and sheets) too much fake tan everywhere

    • VagisBitch

      “Wherever I look in London, I see women throwing their heads back and roaring with laughter; ”
      Wow, very feminine

  • Paki Girl Pakeeza

    Yeah but there are obviously men out there who are attracted to the multiply pierced and multiply tattood gals. And they are men who have multiple tats and piericings themselves.

    Similarly, the fat women are mating with fat men.

    Water seeks its own level.

    • VagisBitch

      And what is your point really ?

      • Shawn

        Pay no attention to hamster yammering.

      • emily

        point is, these women wouldn’t exist if men openly refused to give them any attention. i cant tell you how many times ive seen guys take ugly, easy girls like the ones pictured above home. men are rewarding this kind of behavior by having sex, even one night stands, with these monsters. they mutilate themselves because they have no dignity and figure all the tats make them look free-spirited and full of personality and some men buy into it. its like they have been eating shit for so long they have no appreciation for anything else anymore.

        also, my father would have disowned me if i shaved my head or dyed my hair green or got my nose pierced. the women pictured have a) absent fathers or b) doormats as fathers who never had the balls to discipline them.

        i’m not saying its men’s fault but many of them have been totally complacent in the transformation you see here. our culture is revolting.

      • FuckYou

        Fuck you. Fuck you with a horse Dick. I dye my hair because I like it. Get a tattoo because I want it. I will never change myself for anyone. You are fucking scum. Please destroy your computer and never touch the internet again. Get the fuck out of the gene pool.

      • P Ray

        these women wouldn’t exist if men openly refused to give them any attention.
        Women criminalise the attention “non-alpha” men give women they deem “too good for them”.
        Ever heard of “relational aggression”?
        So the women create and prolong the problem.

  • Unscrupulousmen

    #word #thuglife #NewYear #NewMe #2013 #Merica

  • meh

    What’s wrong with #23? Just because she took a silly pic with a mustache drawn on her finger? She looks like a pretty enough woman who just happened to be goofing around a bit in that photo.

    Also, the fashion in pic #9 (and a few of the others, but that was the worst). I like the weird multicolored tights in #7, though.

    • monster221

      #23 its a tattoo is the point dude. a stupid retarded tatto that a woman put there because she thinks she needs to be witty.

      • anon1

        got it in one, damn right

  • Sigma Male

    Ugh … depressing indeed.

  • Professor Ashur

    Something about one of the comments here brings to mind the phrase “Glorious Natural Pelt”.

  • monster221

    yeah the girls these days may be easier, but they are useless for anything other than a hate fuck and that feeling you get when you blow them off and put them in their place. even the hideous ones act like you arent worth their time (hahahaha).

    the ones from back in the day? even the least feminine of them in the pictures were still ladylike. i could just watch them and even if i never fuck them i could still enjoy being around them.

    granted gentlemen we all want to fuck. but there is something you cant put into words that you want with women other than sex. not love and all that. but some sort of quality or other you get from life where women are women. i dont know about you but that quality is worth the difficulty (if you can call it that) and lowered notch count. wouldnt you rather spend a week (or 2) on a girl and enjoy the whole thing? or would you rather spend a day or two on one and have too keep reminding yourself that theres a reward for having to put up with all this shit? these days we cant even think like that because most of us just assume the process that gets the ass is supposed to suck.

    roosh is right on with the femininity thing dude. even the 6s from back then were preferrable to 10s these days.

    • anon1

      exactly, there’s only so much appeal hate fucking has. affection and femininity are still the most long term desireable traits in a woman

    • TheIdiot

      I think that quality you are wondering about is “grace”.

      Women would grace men with their politeness, thoughtfulness, mannerisms, and good conversation, like I see in my great grandma and grandmas and the old ladies in my apartment. Believe it or not they actually sought to please men, even if it wasn’t out of attraction.

      But the young bitches I see act like divas, are really trashy, and think that men are beneath them. They ignore men they consider useless to them and enjoy being abrasive. That’s because men are tools to them.

  • Francisco

    Es brutal este post Roosh

  • Mat

    The asian girl is really beautiful, but I cant believe that most american girls nowadays look like these ones (Im from France)

  • Anonymous

    The first group mothered the second. I shudder to think what they will spawn.

  • Carl

    There are a couple shots from the 1960s photos where at least one of the women has what appears to be a bandana on her leg. This was not fashion at the time, but I speculate it was in protest during the Vietnam conflict. I think it was men who protested by wearing the bandana on the arm.

  • http://ihatethereforeiam.com decomposer917

    There are still plenty of attractive women in the US, especially in big cities, such as New York, San Francisco and Miami. Many of them are stuck up or too business/career orientated, but on a purely physical level – they are fit and put themselves together very well for work and after work. The above pictures show one ugly side of America but it applies more to trashy suburbs where girls are so bored out of their mind and are so confused by their only exposure to civilization – TV and MTV – that they adopt the the style and the behavior of their favorite reality TV stars.

  • http://Collapseofman.wordpress.com Collapseofman

    It’s been remarked (originally by Baumeister) that young men will work to generate the bare minimum of resources necessary to attain sexual access. With sex now freely available, they have ceased to work for it, and are falling behind in society.

    Women can be looked at in the same way – they will invest the least amount of effort in youth and beauty possible to secure male attention. With economic independence, they no longer need to work to appear worthy of investment, because they don’t rely on marriage for survival.

    The general development of the past 50 years is quite simply that American women no longer need to appear marriageable – they only need to look good enough to fuck, and that bar is set fairly low for the overwhelming majority of men.

    • P Ray

      young men will work to generate the bare minimum of resources necessary to attain sexual access WITH A WOMAN THEY ARE ATTRACTED TO. With sex now freely available, FOR THE MEN ATTRACTIVE TO MANY WOMEN, BETAS have ceased to work for it (as they will only be getting “second hand goods” and be on hook for alimony, and are falling behind in KEEPING THE STATUS QUO IN PLACE.
      Fixed that for you. No charge.

  • Jason

    Those “LIFE magazine” posts are fake. They were shot like last year and artistically styled to look like they’re from the 60s.

  • Ed

    It is a bit of the case of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer in terms of quality of women. Sure the the girls from the 60s on average were thinner and more attractive than today. What the pictures don’t really show are the modern day hotties which are very hot silicon tits, fake tans, cosmetic dentistry, the gym and hair extensions. You could probably add a few more things. One could argue that modern day hotties are much hotter, however they are put on a much higher pedestal. I think one of the downfalls came in the 90s when women stopped wearing hosery. One could even argue the same case for men, if one were to look at photos of soldiers or labourers from that era you could clearly see a lack of obesity and plenty of fit looking physiques.

  • Days of Broken Arrows

    If you go to YouTube and check out music videos where there is a live audience, you’ll see much the same difference in women — with the ladies of the ’80s sitting squarely between the two.

    The modern pics here were not cherry-picked. Sad to say.

  • Dave

    Roosh nailed it in language that few can equal:

    “What man of normal mental health and active libido wants to romantically woo and date, let alone marry, a beastly, waddling tatted mountain of pustulence with the issue of three other men barking and nipping at her cankles?”

    • Roosh

      Heartiste wrote that, not me.

  • external

    American women should hang their heads in deep shame.

  • CyanideRetainer

    Wow, you guys really hate women.

    • eheh

      Derpistan, next exit, your stop.

    • SnootGrammarian

      I’m sure some random attractive woman on the internet will see your limp-wristed defense of all womynkind, backtrace your IP address, and show up at your house to fuck you like a pornstar. Or not. How has supplication been working out for you?

  • Uncle Elmer

    “Similarly, the fat women are mating with fat men.”

    I’ll bet it looks like a log-rolling contest when they do. Tons of fun.

  • http://hbnet@aol.com Howard

    We know things are bad. Worse then bad. There crazy.

    • James

      *They’re crazy.*

  • Slut

    There are just as many ugly women as well as men now as there were in the 60′s. You can not honestly believe every woman was from planet babe back then. Its pretty obvious that the author of this found the absolute best pictures of women from the 60′s and the worst from the present day. You have to keep in mind as well that there are waaay more recent pictures easily accessible now partially due to the internet. You’re going to find a lot of “ugly” women, but you’ll also be able to find just as many “hot” ones.. though the way ive seen people post comments on here im sure no mortal woman could live up to the standards held by some of you men. to everyone moaning about how they wish they had a time machine i strongly encourage you to get the fuck over it because its not going to happen.. even if it did you would probably still be disappointed. The world has always sucked. Only a fool would romanticize the past like this.

    • TheIdiot

      There were as many people born ugly in the 60s as there are now.

      But here’s what you don’t get: In the good old days, there was a far fewer percent disgustingly obese women. Lesbian/dyke trends like shaving your head and being a trashy whore was shunned by society. Back then most women had class.

      • Sydney

        You’re a misogynistic asshole. Who the hell are you to say back then women had class?? Stop glorifying the past where racism was prevalent and women were treated as objects just as much as they are today. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with your so called ‘lesbian/dyke trends’ (btw fuck you, you’re homophobic too? You must get ALL the ladies.) and there’s nothing wrong with women doing what they want with their bodies. This article is sexist & shitty. You’re an idiot if you think that women in the later photos didn’t exist as well in the ’60′s. Do me a favor: look up slut shaming. That’d be you.

  • anon

    Do a google image search for “douchebags” for contemporary images of men who are equally ignorant, disgusting and lacking in self-respect.

    Contast with the first image for “Harvard 1963″.

    QED.

  • Pingback: Historia « Yasers hörna

  • http://Pinterest autumn

    Just a bunch of lonely men that have been turned down one too many times. you should all start a club. And truly, how the hell do you know???? Were you there roaming around, checking out all the hot 60′s ass? I think not! I’d like to think we have ALL evolved, but reading through the majority of these replys….hmmm

  • Pingback: Women Are Just Slabs of Meat

  • John

    I disagree with this entire article. You are really telling me “The 60s were the time man!”

    F*** the 60s. The girls there look like hippie tools (at least half of them). If you want to see real modern American women go to the 1940s or 50s. The girls in number 23 and 25 seem better than literally 80% of the photos you have from the 60s.

    Bell Bottom paints, john lennon glasses, clashing colours and hippy styles… Nostalgic Boomer Facepalm -_-

    • Boka

      So you’re saying.. if you want to see a “real American woman” you need to go back to when they were basically slaves?

  • Anonymous

    first 18 pics :D

    once i got to 19 D:

  • marvin r

    Man, before women’s lib, women were feminine and pleasant to be with, you could actually marry them they would make good mothers and wives. Today? They whore themselves through their 20s and they still expect men to treat them as you would treat a lady. They are also very unpleasant to be around and make terrible mothers and wives. No wonder men don’t want to marry.

    “Men” today are a bunch of pussies, quit being a bitch around women, stop catering to those women who are dysfunctional

    Please note that every rule has an exception, so don’t complain about my argument “generalizing women.”

    • really?

      omg you are hilarious

  • Quintus Curtius

    Read this again just for fun…cannot stop laughing. Priceless, priceless.

  • Erin

    It must have been a lot of work to hunt down the best pictures from the 60s and the worst ones from today. Kudos on all your hard work, you ass.

  • sarah

    Well, this isn’t misogynistic at all.

    • SnootGrammarian

      Just as “gay” became redefined to mean people attracted to the same gender, “misogyny,” by use and association, is now code for “the truth.” For instance,

      Women abuse children at a higher rate than men. “That’s misogynistic!”
      Women on OkCupid rated 80% of men less than average looking, defying statistical reality “That’s misogynistic!”
      Women file for 72% of divorces. “That’s misogynistic!”
      Women have less attraction to men who share equally in chores. “That’s misogynistic!”

      Nevermind all of these are proven with vigorous studies. It makes womyn somewhere feel bad, and that’s all “misogyny” means anymore.

  • really?

    lol is this a joke? Where am I? The Onion? (Because fat people didn’t exist in the 60s and no one ever got drunk)

    • SnootGrammarian

      You poor, stupid creature.

  • katjazz

    All of the first section was of pictures from fucking magazines, and the ones from this era are just random people’s photos. I don’t care what era you’re in, there’s gonna be a difference ffs.

  • http://twitter.com/YHoNei Yvonne H. N.

    The “funny” thing is, apart from what many of the commenters already pointed out is wrong with this collection, the very women from the 60ties and 70ties you post here got the same echo from media and society today’s women get. They were bashed for dressing like long haired hippies and not like ladies, protest culture and not staying at home like they should anymore, wether it was true in the individual case or not, having become difficult, having no class, not knowing anymore how to take care of a man, bla bla bla… for the way they let their hair down, they were called filthy because they didn’t look like women 30 years earlier, insulted and generalized as sluts just the way today’s women are in this piece… You know… you’re not even original. There’s always a part of the population that will indulge in this reflex. The base line is always: “I have problems with women. I don’t like them. They should do more to appeal to my personal taste.” The trick in this one: “I wouldn’t have had problems with women 30 years ago, so it can’t be me, right?”

  • Fiona PS

    This is so disgusting. You realize that women aren’t created for your pleasure? It’s none of your business what clothes we wear, what our hair looks like, our piercings, our body shape, our politics, or anything else. And, please, explain to me how wearing revealing clothes is such a bad thing when some of your “ideal” pictures of women has girls in their bikinis. And women drank alchohol, and had short hair, etc back then. Also, the protest march. Do you think women didn’t go to protest marches back then? Because I can assure you, they did. This is just the most vile thing I have seen, and I am almost ashamed to be an American because of this.

    • Relampago2013

      And men were’nt created to be accessories to drag around like the latest purse then discarded when it’s convenient, or you have a mood swing, nor were they created to be walking ATM machines.

      The funny thing is, you don’t realize you and your ilk are going to be an extinct breed soon. I am enjoying watching every second of the American woman’s downfall, and you can take your smug, self-righteous attitudes with you.

      Even funnier is that you don’t even seem to know or care what is happening.
      Annoying little facts like 50% of all marriages of American men will soon be to foreign women. And the fact that your deathstyles (oppostite of lifestyles) mean that there won’t be many of you around in the next generation. (Check Western birth rates if you doubt it.)

  • Pingback: Everything Is Not Amazing Right Now | Party Travel Sex Love

  • Pingback: Entitlement dating? | Traditional Christianity

  • sunshinemary

    Wow, this is great! Why are modern women so intent on uglifying themselves? It’s not just the fatness, it’s all the piercings and tattoos. Women one generation ago did not do that to themselves, even if they weren’t beautiful. And they didn’t wear pajama pants in public either.

Back to Top ↑

© Return Of Kings



Back to Top ↑